- Advocacy and Community Building
- Activism tips/resources
- Ask the advocate
- Budget advocacy
- Child care/early care and education
- Child welfare
- Communities committed to children
- Community building
- Election advocacy
- Health
- Parent activism
- Parent activism in schools
- Parent leadership training
- Parent Voices
- Policy Smart / Children's advocates' roundtable
- Poverty/welfare
- Profiles in Action / Grassroots snapshots
- Racial justice
- Violence prevention
- Books for children
- Child Care and Early Care and Education
- Advocacy tips/resources
- Availability
- Budget advocacy
- California Child Development Corps
- Children with special needs
- Community resources
- Compensation and training
- Early care and education
- Elections
- Family child care
- Family/friend/neighbor care
- Hands-on activities
- Head Start
- Health
- Immigrant families
- Infant/toddler care
- Multicultural/diversity
- Parent activism
- Parent Voices
- Play in child care
- Preschool for all
- Promoting positive behavior
- Ready for school in the U.S.
- School readiness
- School-age child care
- Social/emotional development
- Teacher/provider activism
- Teacher/provider advice
- Teaching/learning
- Working with families
- Child Welfare
- Health
- Advocacy/community building
- Asthma/environmental health/toxins
- Child care
- Child development
- Children with special needs
- Community resources
- Dental health/vision
- Family support
- Health insurance
- Health outreach
- Infants/toddlers
- Injury prevention
- Mental health
- Multicultural/diversity
- Nutrition/hunger/obesity
- Parent activism
- Physical activity
- Raising kids
- School-based health
- Successful strategies for children's health
- Parents and Families
- As We Grow And Learn / Raising kids
- Child abuse prevention
- Child development and families
- Child welfare and families
- Children of prisoners
- Children with special needs
- Community resources/family support
- Divorce
- Domestic violence
- Family relationships
- Family support works!
- Grandparents/elders
- Hands-on activities
- Health
- Immigrant families
- Infants/toddlers
- Multicultural/diversity and families
- Parent activism in schools
- Parent activism on child care
- Parent activism on health
- Parent activism on poverty and welfare
- Parent activism tips/resources
- Parent and family advice
- Parent and teacher action
- Parent involvement in child care
- Parent Voices
- Pathways to parent leadership
- Positive parenting/discipline
- Poverty/income/welfare
- School readiness
- Social/emotional development
- Violence prevention
- Poverty/income/welfare
- Schools and School-Age Children
- Violence Prevention
Election 2010: Proposition 20 and Proposition 27
Who should draw district lines?
From Fall 2010 Issue
By Jessine Foss
Prop. 20 and Prop. 27 are two conflicting measures about who should draw the districts for members of Congress and the legislature. In 2008, voters approved a measure that took away the legislature’s power to redraw their districts and gave it to an independent committee. Prop. 20 would have the committee also draw congressional districts. Prop. 27 would abolish the committee, return power to redraw state districts to the legislature, and let voters reject district maps.
Prop. 20: Commission able to redraw Congressional districts
Support
Prop. 20 would “hold politicians more accountable, [so] they’re not drawing districts to the advantage of friends in Congress,” says Susan Shafer with the Yes on 20/No on 27 campaign.
- Legislators help make sure their friends in Congress are re-elected by drawing district lines that divide communities.
- Districts would include people with “similar living standards” to make sure communities are not divided.
Supporters: Yes on 20/No on 27 (www.yes20no27.org), California Chamber of Commerce, California NAACP State Conference, Latin Business Association.
Opposition
“[Prop. 20] would add income to the list of things taken into consideration” when drawing districts, says Kevin Murray with the Prop. 27 campaign. “If you put all the poor in one district that does kids a disservice” because fewer elected officials will advocate for them. The measure
- “Harks back to the Jim Crow laws, when there were only affluent people or poor people in the same district,” adds Murray.
Opponents: No on 20 (www.noprop20.org), League of Women Voters, AFSCME, California Labor Federation.
Prop. 27: Legislature able to redraw districts
Support
Since 1998, “redistricting is being done with an unseen panel. They don’t know anything about our communities,” says Murray. “It affects [children’s advocates’] ability to advocate effectively if the community is split into two districts.”
- The legislature should have the power to redraw districts because legislators are accountable to voters.
Supporters: Yes on 27 (www.yesprop27.org), AFSCME, California Labor Federation.
Opposition
Prop. 27 “is supported by politicians protecting their turf. It goes against the will of the voters” who approved the independent commission, says Shafer.
- When politicians draw their own districts, they often create safe districts to get re-elected each year—and have little incentive to fix problems.
Opponents: Yes on 20/No on 27 (www.yes20no27.org), California Chamber of Commerce, California NAACP State Conference, Latin Business Association.
Use our articles
Use the Children's Advocate in your work! Feel free to reprint these articles, as handouts or in your own publication – just credit us and be sure to send us a copy.
From Fall 2010 Issue
Related topics: Advocacy and Community Building, Election advocacy
Other: Contact us | Give us your feedback | How to use this article | Subscribe
